Step by Step instructions to Solve Data Sufficiency Questions Quickly
Step by Step instructions to Solve Data Sufficiency

Step by Step instructions to Solve Data Sufficiency Questions Quickly

Data sufficiency (DS) concept is a standout amongst Quantitative Section in different competitive examinations like IBPS PO, SBI PO, LIC, RBI, CAT and so forth.

In Data Sufficiency questions, the competitors don’t need to find the exact answer. In fact the main thing that they need to figure out is the announcements gave in the inquiry contain enough data or not.

There is an incredible chance that in all exams, you can find more than 5 questions from this section. This implies that you ought to spend more energy for getting certain with these sorts of inquiries.

We have seen that a greater part of hopeful attempt take after mystery to answer these information adequacy questions. This is not the right approach. So as opposed to speculating, we ought to use certain tips and traps to settle these inquiries.

Don’t Solve the Question: 

The intriguing part about DS sort inquiries is that they just make whether the inquiry can be illuminated with the assistance of data given in the announcements. That just means there is no compelling reason to tackle that inquiry totally and waste your valuable time. So simply answer these inquiries and don’t attempt to explain them. There are few regular traps.

Try not to think as far as “What will be the exact esteem?” or “Is it valid or not?”

Rather, simply concentrate on one and only issue “Is the data enough to answer the inquiry?”

Illustration: 

  • On the off chance that announcement only I is adequate to answer the inquiry, Marks A as answer
  • On the off chance that announcement II alone is adequate to answer the inquiry, Marks B as answer
  • On the off chance that announcement I and II together are adequate to answer the inquiry yet neither articulation alone is adequate to answer the inquiry, Marks C as answer
  • In the event that either articulation I or II alone is adequate to answer the inquiry, Marks D as answer
  • In the event that announcement I and II together are not adequate to answer the inquiry, Marks E as answer

Example Question:

What amount was the cost of Diamond Necklace in January 2000? 

Explanation I: In January 2010 the neckband was worth $10,000.

Explanation II: Over the ten years 2000-2010, the neckband increased in quality by 10% every 12 months.

Arrangement 

  1. Proclamation (1) is deficient. You don’t have the foggiest idea about the rate at which esteem has changed. You promptly know the answer must be B, C or E.
  2. Articulation (2) is lacking. Without a quality somewhere around 2000 and 2010, you can’t compute the worth.
  3. Utilizing articulations (1) and (2) together, you could figure the quality in 2000. Since you require both proclamations to discover the worth, the answer is alternative (C).

The trap: Don’t do the computation. For most “esteem” inquiries, you could figure the quality however figuring is an exercise in futility. The issue inquires whether there is enough data to answer the inquiry, not for the genuine answer.

Attempt YES NO sort addresses first

Various inquiries depend on “YES-NO” sort information. See the announcements and dispose of them on the premise of yes or no.

Case: 

  • In the event that announcement only I is adequate to answer the inquiry, Marks An as answer
  • In the event that announcement II alone is adequate to answer the inquiry, Marks B as answer
  • In the event that announcement I and II together are adequate to answer the inquiry however neither proclamation alone is adequate to answer the inquiry, Marks C as answer
  • In the event that either explanation I or II alone is adequate to answer the inquiry, Marks D as answer
  • In the event that announcement I and II together are not adequate to answer the inquiry, Marks E as answer

Is x detachable by 28? 

Explanation I: x is distinguishable by 20

Explanation II: x is distinguishable by 84

Arrangement:

  1. Utilizing explanation I – x is distinguishable by 4 and 5
  2. Utilizing explanation II – x is distinguishable by 3, 4 and 7.
  3. By utilizing both explanations we can presume that x is detachable by 28 (4*7), henceforth answer is C.
  4. Treat both the announcements independently

So now you have considered the inquiry and investigated the data given in, this is the ideal opportunity to break down the announcements given in the inquiry. The key guideline here “Read proclamations freely of each other”. Attempt to “overlook” proclamation 1 preceding you proceed onward to explanation 2.

Try not to extend any data from proclamation 1 when you read explanation 2.

Illustration: 

What number of grown-ups eats pizza in city X on the off chance that all grown-ups in city X either eat Pizza or Pasta? 

Explanation I: 75% of the 100,000 grown-ups in city X eat Pasta.

Explanation II: 75,000 grown-ups in city X eat Pasta.

Arrangement 

  1. Explanation (1) is adequate. Taking a percent of an aggregate populace permits you to compute the grown-ups that eat pizza. (NO compelling reason to do the estimation.) You instantly know the answer is An or D.
  2. Articulation (2) is inadequate. Without the total populace or other data, you can’t figure the quantity of grown-ups eating pasta.
  3. Since first articulation alone is adequate, the right answer is choice (A).

The trap: Keep the data from first proclamation and second articulation as partitioned. Either the rate or total populace from first articulation can put forth second expression adequate.

Continuously read every announcement independently.

When you read second proclamation, overlook what you read in first articulation so you can assess second explanation alone.

The main time to consolidate the announcements is the point at which each of them is deficient alone

Wipe out wrong choices: 

This will help you to wipe out the announcements rapidly on the off chance that you have something to contrast and the data given.

Do this progression with an engaged personality.

  • In the event that first explanation is adequate, dispose B, C, and E.
  • You will now be left with just two alternatives i.e. A and D.
  • Similarly If second proclamation is adequate, take out A, C, and E.
  • You will now be left with just two choices i.e. B and D.
  • Alternately if first articulation is NOT adequate, take out A and D
  • In the same if second explanation is NOT adequate, take out B and D.
  • Along these lines you can take out various choices.

Key Point to Note: Don’t recollect the grouping of the alternatives. Once in a while they may even change the arrangement of the alternatives. So dependably read the succession of choices in the exam.

Join the discussion